Language as a semiotic system of digital communications

Authors

  • M.G. NAZAROVA E.A. Buketov Karaganda National Research University Karaganda
  • G.A. SEIDULLAYEVA International Educational Corporation
  • Zh.M. ZHAMPEISOVA Kazakh Leading Academy of Architecture and Civil Engineering

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47526/3107-3085.235

Keywords:

language, digital communication, semiotics, multimodality, cognitive linguistics.

Abstract

The article examines language as a multi-level sign system in the context of digital communication. The study demonstrates how traditional linguistic levels—phonetic, morphological, syntactic, and semantic—are integrated with the affordances of digital media. Digital communication combines linguistic signs (text, emojis, hashtags) with visual and paralinguistic elements (images, GIFs, hyperlinks), creating a hybrid semiotic environment. The research draws on Ferdinand de Saussure’s concept of the sign and meaning, Roman Jakobson’s communication model, Charles Sanders Peirce’s triadic semiotics, and Yuri Lotman’s cultural semiotics.

The research methods include comparative-cognitive analysis, corpus linguistics, and social semiotics. The empirical base consists of 1,500 messages collected from the platforms Twitter, Telegram, and Reddit. The sample covers various genres, multimodal types, and language varieties. The messages were annotated according to modality, semiotic elements, structural features, and pragmatic functions.

The findings reveal four key trends: digital communication functions as integrated signal complexes; the shift toward visual and interactive codes transforms cognitive processes; “digital bilingualism” emerges; and online communities develop platform-specific grammatical and semantic models. These processes enhance the semiotic complexity of language and its adaptive potential.

In conclusion, language in digital communication represents a multimodal, multi-level, hybrid semiotic system in which meaning is constructed through user interaction. The results contribute to understanding the evolutionary trends of 21st-century communication and are applicable in linguistics, media semiotics, and pedagogy.

References

1. Jacobson, R. (1960). Closing statement: Linguistics and poetics. In T. A. Sebeok (Ed.), Style in Language (pp. 350–377). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

2. Kress, G., and van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal discourse: methods and tools of modern communication. Arnold.

3. Lotman, J. (1990). The World of Reason: a semiotic theory of culture. Indiana University Press.

4. Pierce, K. S. (1931-1958). The collected works of Charles Sanders Pierce (edited by K. Hartshorn and P. Weiss). Harvard University Press.

5. Smith, J., Abdrakhmanova, A., and Kalinin, A. (2023). Digital semiotics and hybrid communication systems. Journal of Linguistic Research, 12(4), 45-59.

6. Adorno, T., & Horkheimer, M. (1997). Dialectic of Enlightenment: Philosophical Fragments. Cambridge: MIT Press. 312 p.

7. Adorno, T. (2001). The culture industry: Enlightenment as mass deception. In The Culture Industry: Selected Essays on Mass Culture. London: Routledge, pp. 85–110.

8. Barthes, R. (2004). Mythologies. New York: Hill and Wang. 351 p.

9. Bauman, Z. (2004). Globalization: The Human Consequences. New York: Columbia University Press. 188 p.

10. Bell, D. (1999). The Coming of Post-Industrial Society. New York: Basic Books. 790 p.

11. Baudrillard, J. (2006). The Consumer Society: Myths and Structures. London: Sage Publications. 269 p.

12. Bourdieu, P. (2007). Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 576 p.

13. Dobrenko, E. (2003). Political Economy of Socialist Realism. New Haven: Yale University Press. 416 p.

14. Dubin, B. (2010). Mass culture in contemporary Russia: Mechanisms and practices. Sociological Studies, 6, 3–14.

15. Hall, S. (2012). Cultural identity and diaspora. Journal of Sociology, 4, 45–60.

16. Habermas, J. (2001). The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. Cambridge: Polity Press. 344 p.

17. Kirillova, N.B. (2011). Mass Culture as a Social Phenomenon. Yekaterinburg: Ural Federal University Press. 240 p.

18. Luhmann, N. (2005). The Reality of the Mass Media. Stanford: Stanford University Press. 256 p.

19. Marcuse, H. (1994). One-Dimensional Man. Boston: Beacon Press. 368 p.

20. Mannheim, K. (1994). Diagnosis of Our Time. London: Routledge. 700 p.

21. McLuhan, M. (2003). Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. London: Routledge. 464 p.

22. Moles, A. (1973). Sociodynamics of Culture. London: Allen & Unwin. 406 p.

23. Toffler, A. (2004). The Third Wave. New York: Bantam Books. 784 p.

24. White, L. (2004). The Science of Culture. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux. 416 p.

25. Eco, U. (2005). Apocalypse Postponed. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. 379 p.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-30

How to Cite

NAZAROVA, M., SEIDULLAYEVA, G., & ZHAMPEISOVA , Z. (2026). Language as a semiotic system of digital communications. Yassawi Journal of Philology, 3(3), 69–78. https://doi.org/10.47526/3107-3085.235