USING DIGITAL RESOURCES TO TEACH STUDENTS THE BASICS OF PLANT BIOTECHNOLOGY
Keywords:
digital resources, plant biotechnology, technologies, laboratories, education, multimedia, visualization.Abstract
The article presents a study of the use of digital technologies in teaching students the basics of plant biotechnology. Modern educational technologies, such as virtual laboratories, multimedia resources and interactive models, make the learning process more interactive, visual and accessible, as well as contribute to the development of practical skills. With the rapid progress in biotechnology, it is important that students not only master the theoretical foundations, but also be able to effectively apply knowledge in simulated laboratory conditions. The purpose of this study is to identify the most effective digital resources for teaching the basics of plant biotechnology and to assess their impact on the quality of the educational process. As part of the work, a comprehensive analysis of existing digital educational platforms, virtual laboratories, multimedia materials and interactive models was carried out. The features of the integration of these technologies into educational practice and their impact on the cognitive activity of students are considered. The article focuses on the advantages of using digital technologies in teaching, such as increasing student engagement, visualizing complex biotechnological processes, and developing autonomy in the learning process. The conducted pedagogical experiment has shown that the introduction of digital resources contributes to a deeper assimilation of educational material, the development of critical thinking and independence of students. The results obtained can be used to optimize methodological approaches in teaching plant biotechnology and create an effective digital educational environment.
References
REFERENCES
1. Bhardwaj A., Kishore S., Pandey D.K. Artificial intelligence in biological sciences // Life. – 2022. – Т.
12. – № 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/life12091430
2. Hesami M., et al. Machine learning: its challenges and opportunities in plant system biology // Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. – 2022. – Т. 106. – №9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-022-11963-6
3. Sun L., et al. Modern plant breeding techniques in crop improvement and genetic diversity: from molecular markers and gene editing to artificial intelligence – A critical review // Plants. – 2024. – Т. 13, №19. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13192676
4. Babović Z., et al. Research in computing-intensive simulations for nature-oriented civil-engineering and related scientific fields, using machine learning and big data: an overview of open problems // Journal of
Big Data. – 2023. – Т. 10, №1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40537-023-00731-6
5. Zawish M., et al. AI and 6G into the metaverse: Fundamentals, challenges and future research trends // IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society. – 2024. – Т. 5. – P. 730-778. https://doi.org/10.1109/OJCOMS.2024.3349465
6. Lucibello S., Rotondi C. Bio-digital ‘Material Systems’: New Hybrid Ways for Material-Driven Design Innovation // Biomimetics, Biodesign and Bionics: Technological Advances Toward Sustainable Development. – Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, 2024. – P. 37-68.
7. Steigvilaitė G., Vaičiulytė L. Application of sustainable technological solutions for the development of fermented plant products // Open Readings 2024: The 67th International Conference for Students of Physics and Natural Sciences: Book of Abstracts. – Vilnius University Press, 2024. – С. 1-13.
8. Gerakari M., et al. Breeding of Solanaceous Crops Using AI: Machine and Deep Learning Approaches. – 2025. – P. 1-21. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15030757
9. Hernández-Mustieles M. A., et al. Wearable biosensor technology in education: A systematic review // Sensors. – 2024. – Т. 24, №8. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24082437
10. Hemming J., Balendonck J. Advances in the use of robotics in greenhouse cultivation // In: van Henten
E., Edan Y. (Eds.) Advances in agri-food robotics. – 2024. – P. 635-660. https://doi.org/10.19103/AS.2023.0124.24
11. Исаев Ғ.И., Кәрімжан Т.М., Әзімбай А.И. Биотехнология пәніндегі тәжірибелік сабақтар арқылы болашақ педагог-биологтардың зерттеу дағдыларын қалыптастыру // Ясауи университетінің хабаршысы. – 2024. – №1 (131). – Б. 346–356. https://doi.org/10.47526/2024-1/2664-0686.28 // Isaev G.I., Karіmzhan T.M., Azіmbai A.I. Biotehnologia panіndegі tazhіribelіk sabaqtar arqyly bolashaq pedagog-biologtardyn zertteu dagdylaryn qalyptastyru [Formation of research skills of future teachersbiologists through practical training in biotechnology] // Iasaui universitetіnіn habarshysy. – 2024. – №1(131). – B. 346–356. https://doi.org/10.47526/2024-1/2664-0686.28 [in Kazakh]
12. Arango-Caro S., et al. 3D plants: the impact of integrating science, design, and technology on high school student learning and interests in STEAM subjects and careers // Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research. – 2025. – Т. 7, №1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-025-00120-4
13. Issaro S., et al. Blockchain-based credit transfer for higher education institutions // International Journal of Educational Communications and Technology. – 2022. – Т. 2, №2. – P. 46-60.
14. Mercado J., Picardal J.P. Virtual laboratory simulations in biotechnology: A systematic review // Science Education International. – 2023. – Т. 34, №1. – P. 52-57.
15. Guillén-Gámez F.D. et al. Differential analysis of the years of experience of higher education teachers, their digital competence and use of digital resources: Comparative research methods // Technology, Knowledge and Learning. – 2022. – Т. 27, №4. – P. 1193-1213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-02109531-4
16. Carroll J.S., Najafi H., Steiner M. Evaluating the effectiveness of virtual laboratory simulations for graduate-level training in genetic methodologies // Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education. – 2025. – Vol. 53, №4. – P. 422-432.
17. Ambusaidi A., Al-Balushi S., Al-Balushi K. The impact of virtual lab learning experiences on 9th grade students’ achievement and attitudes // Journal of Turkish Science Education. – 2018. – Vol. 15, №2. – P. 13-29.
18. Gamage S.H.P.W., Ayres J.R., Behrend M.B. A systematic review on trends in using Moodle for teaching and learning // International Journal of STEM Education. – 2022. – Vol. 9, №1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-021-00323-x
19. Anwar Y.A.S., Damianus R., Wiyarsi A., Ramadhani E. Exploration of critical thinking and self-regulated learning in online biochemistry learning // Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education. – 2022. – Vol. 50, №4. – P. 339-350.
20. Du Plooy E., Casteleijn D., Franzsen D. Personalized adaptive learning in higher education: A scoping review of key characteristics and impact on academic performance and engagement // Heliyon. – 2024. –
Т. 10, №21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39630
21. Makransky G., Wismer P., Mayer R.E. A cognitive theory of immersion: How virtual reality affects learning outcomes in laboratory-based sciences // Computers & Education. – 2021. – Vol. 175. – P. 104115.
22. Wu J., Li Y., He H. Virtual simulation-based biotechnology teaching: Improving procedural understanding and reducing laboratory risks // Journal of Biological Education. – 2022. – Vol. 56, №4. – P. 530-545.
23. Poltavskiy A., Kolomiiets O., Chiang F. Virtual STEM laboratories and student motivation: Evidence from multi-country experimental research // International Journal of STEM Education. – 2023. – Vol. 10, №1. – P. 87-101.
24. Soni R., Singh R. Adaptive learning analytics for biotechnology education: Machine learning approaches for personalized instruction // Education and Information Technologies. – 2024. – Vol. 29, №2. – P. 22312254.
