COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF GENDER STUDIES COURSES IN KAZAKHSTAN AND THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47526/3107-3123.336Keywords:
gender education, higher education, Kazakhstan, United States, comparative analysis, interdisciplinarity.Abstract
This study presents a comparative analysis of gender studies courses in Kazakhstan and the United States, examining how the field is institutionalized, structured, and pedagogically implemented across distinct higher education systems. Drawing on feminist theory, intersectionality, and postcolonial approaches, the research analyzes 97 gender-related courses across 29 Kazakhstani universities and compares them with 204 courses offered at American University and University of Wisconsin-Madison. Using qualitative document analysis and semi-structured faculty interviews, the study evaluates three analytical dimensions: institutionalization, curriculum breadth, and pedagogical practice. The findings reveal that in Kazakhstan, gender studies remains predominantly elective-based and embedded within traditional departments, with limited interdisciplinary expansion and minimal integration of experiential learning components. In contrast, the U.S. institutions examined demonstrate fully institutionalized, degree-granting programs characterized by interdisciplinary curricula, explicit incorporation of intersectionality, and structured experiential learning opportunities such as internships and capstone projects. The study argues that these differences reflect divergent trajectories of disciplinary consolidation shaped by governance structures, policy environments, and institutional capacity. It concludes by proposing a multidimensional framework for strengthening gender studies education in Kazakhstan through enhanced institutional support, interdisciplinary integration, and practice-oriented curriculum development.
References
1. Experts discussed issues of gender equality in education in Kazakhstan. UNESCO News. [Electronic resource]. URL: https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/experts-discussed-issues-gender-equality-educationkazakhstan (date of access 20.06.2025)
2. Butler J. Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York and London: Routledge, 2002. [Electronic resource]. URL: https://selforganizedseminar.wordpress.com/wpcontent/uploads/2011/07/butler-gender_trouble.pdf (date of access 20.06.2025)
3. Crenshaw K. Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique // University of Chicago Legal Forum. – 1989. – №1. – P. 139–167.
4. Connell R.W. Gender in world perspective. – Cambridge: Polity Press, 2009. [Electronic resource]. URL: https://xyonline.net/sites/xyonline.net/files/2019-
08/Connell%2C%20Gender%20in%20World%20Perspective%2C%202nd%20Edition%20%282009%2
9.pdf (date of access 20.06.2025)
5. Arnot M., Weiner G. Gender and the politics of schooling. – London: Routledge, 2017. – 408 p.
6. Unterhalter E., North A. Education, poverty and global goals for gender equality. – London: Routledge,
2017. [Electronic resource]. URL: https://www.routledge.com/Education-Poverty-and-Global-Goals-forGender-Equality-How-People-Make-Policy-Happen/Unterhalter-
North/p/book/9780367203795?srsltid=AfmBOoroqEeK-8HfbI9q6Vp9y6bfP3ZKL5ktnH-Fsnw87JYr5MhjMJq (date of access 21.06.2025)
7. Morley L. Sister-matic: Gender mainstreaming in higher education // Teaching in Higher Education. – 2007. – №12(5). – P. 607–620. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510701595267
8. Agabekova Zh., Salimzhanova A., Suleimenova Zh., Yestekova G. Gender perspectives in higher education: Enhancing gender studies in Kazakhstan // Journal of Social Studies Education Research. – 2025. – №16(1). – P. 88–137.
9. Хасбулатова О.А., Смирнова И.Н. Женское движение в России: моделирование баланса взаимодействия государства и женской инициативы // Женщина в Российском обществе. – 2021. – №1. – С. 3-19. https://doi.org/10.21064/WinRS.2021.1.1
10. Шнырова О. Проблемы восприятия гендерных исследований в академической среде // Пол. Гендер. Культура. – 2000. – Т.2. – С. 231-238.
11. Leathwood C., Read B. Gender and the changing face of higher education: A feminized future? – Maidenhead: Open University Press, 2009. – 217 p.
12. Nussbaum M. Women and human development: The capabilities approach. – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511841286
13. Lorde A. Sister outsider: Essays and speeches. – Trumansburg, NY: Crossing Press, 1984.
14. Lather P. Getting smart: Feminist research and pedagogy within the postmodern. – New York: Routledge,
1991. [Electronic resource]. URL: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/mono/10.4324/9780203451311/getting-smart-patti-lather (date of access 21.06.2025)
15. Khairullayeva V., Sarybayev M., Kuzembayeva A., Yermekbayev A., Baikushikova G. Gender Policy in Kazakhstan // Journal of International Women’s Studies. – 2022. – №24(1). [Electronic resource]. URL:
https://vc.bridgew.edu/jiws/vol24/iss1/25/ (date of access 20.06.2025)
16. American University Catalog 2026-2027. [Electronic resource]. URL: https://catalog.american.edu/content.php?filter%5B27%5D=-
1&filter%5B29%5D=&filter%5Bkeyword%5D=gender&filter%5B32%5D=1&filte
r%5Bcpage%5D=1&cur_cat_oid=18&expand=&navoid=3072&search_database=Fi lter#acalog_template_course_filter (date of access 20.06.2025)
17. Gender and Women's Studies. [Electronic resource]. URL: https://guide.wisc.edu/courses/gen_ws/ (date of access 20.06.2025)
18. Women's, Gender, & Sexuality Studies. [Electronic resource]. URL: https://www.american.edu/cas/wgss/ (date of access 20.06.2025)
19. Gender and Women's Studies, BS. [Electronic resource]. URL: https://guide.wisc.edu/undergraduate/letters-science/gender-womens-studies/gender-womens-studies-bs/ (date of access 20.06.2025)
20. Lakoff R. Language and woman’s place. – New York: Harper & Row, 1975. [Electronic resource]. URL:
https://www.scribd.com/document/272131684/Lakoff-Robin-Language-and-Womans-Place (date of access 20.06.2025)
21. Harding S. The feminist standpoint theory reader: Intellectual and political controversies. – New York: Routledge, 2004. – 394 p.
22. Skelton C., Francis B. Feminism and ‘the schooling scandal’. – London: Routledge, 2009. – 192 p.
23. Здравомыслова Е.А., Темкина А.А. 12 лекций по гендерной социологии: учебное пособие. – СанктПетербург: Издательство Европейского университета в Санкт-Петербурге, 2015. – 768 с.
24. Кирилина А. О применении понятия гендер в русскоязычном лингвистическом описании // Филологические науки. – 2000. – №3. – С. 18-27.
25. Mun O., Kudaibergen D.T. Jeong and asar: Theorising reparative concepts in gendered artistic, activist, and academic spaces // European Journal of Women’s Studies. – 2025. – №32(2). – P. 159–176.
https://doi.org/10.1177/13505068251330986
26. Braidotti R. Metamorphoses: Towards a materialist theory of becoming. – Cambridge: Polity Press, 2002. – 328 p.
1. Experts discussed issues of gender equality in education in Kazakhstan. UNESCO News. [Electronic resource]. URL: https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/experts-discussed-issues-gender-equality-educationkazakhstan (date of access 20.06.2025)
2. Butler J. Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York and London: Routledge, 2002. [Electronic resource]. URL: https://selforganizedseminar.wordpress.com/wp-
content/uploads/2011/07/butler-gender_trouble.pdf (date of access 20.06.2025)
3. Crenshaw K. Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique // University of Chicago Legal Forum. – 1989. – №1. – P. 139–167.
4. Connell R.W. Gender in world perspective. – Cambridge: Polity Press, 2009. [Electronic resource]. URL: https://xyonline.net/sites/xyonline.net/files/2019-
08/Connell%2C%20Gender%20in%20World%20Perspective%2C%202nd%20Edition%20%282009%2
9.pdf (date of access 20.06.2025)
5. Arnot M., Weiner G. Gender and the politics of schooling. – London: Routledge, 2017. – 408 p.
6. Unterhalter E., North A. Education, poverty and global goals for gender equality. – London: Routledge,
2017. [Electronic resource]. URL: https://www.routledge.com/Education-Poverty-and-Global-Goals-forGender-Equality-How-People-Make-Policy-Happen/Unterhalter-
North/p/book/9780367203795?srsltid=AfmBOoroqEeK-8HfbI9q6Vp9y6bfP3ZKL5ktnH-Fsnw87JYr5MhjMJq (date of access 21.06.2025)
7. Morley L. Sister-matic: Gender mainstreaming in higher education // Teaching in Higher Edu-cation. – 2007. – №12(5). – P. 607–620. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510701595267
8. Agabekova Zh., Salimzhanova A., Suleimenova Zh., Yestekova G. Gender perspectives in higher education: Enhancing gender studies in Kazakhstan // Journal of Social Studies Education Research. – 2025. – №16(1). – P. 88–137.
9. Hasbulatova O.A., Smirnova I.N. Zhenskoe dvizhenie v Rossii: modelirovanie balansa vzaimodeistvia gosudarstva i zhenskoi iniciativy [The Women's Movement in Russia: modeling the balance of interaction between the State and women's Initiative] // Zhenshina v Rossiskom obshestve. – 2021. – №1. – S. 3-19. https://doi.org/10.21064/WinRS.2021.1.1 [in Russian]
10. Shnyrova O. Problemy vospriatia gendernyh issledovani v akademicheskoi srede [Problems of perception of gender studies in the academic environment] // Pol. Gender. Kultura. – 2000. – T.2. – S. 231-238. [in Russian]
11. Leathwood C., Read B. Gender and the changing face of higher education: A feminized future? – Maidenhead: Open University Press, 2009. – 217 p.
12. Nussbaum M. Women and human development: The capabilities approach. – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511841286
13. Lorde A. Sister outsider: Essays and speeches. – Trumansburg, NY: Crossing Press, 1984.
14. Lather P. Getting smart: Feminist research and pedagogy within the postmodern. – New York: Routledge,
1991. [Electronic resource]. URL: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/mono/10.4324/9780203451311/getting-smart-patti-lather (date of access 21.06.2025)
15. Khairullayeva V., Sarybayev M., Kuzembayeva A., Yermekbayev A., Baikushikova G. Gender Policy in Kazakhstan // Journal of International Women’s Studies. – 2022. – №24(1). [Electronic resource]. URL:
https://vc.bridgew.edu/jiws/vol24/iss1/25/ (date of access 20.06.2025)
16. American University Catalog 2026-2027. [Electronic resource]. URL: https://catalog.american.edu/content.php?filter%5B27%5D=-
1&filter%5B29%5D=&filter%5Bkeyword%5D=gender&filter%5B32%5D=1&filte
r%5Bcpage%5D=1&cur_cat_oid=18&expand=&navoid=3072&search_database=Fi lter#acalog_template_course_filter (date of access 20.06.2025)
17. Gender and Women's Studies. [Electronic resource]. URL: https://guide.wisc.edu/courses/gen_ws/ (date of access 20.06.2025)
18. Women's, Gender, & Sexuality Studies. [Electronic resource]. URL: https://www.american.edu/cas/wgss/
(date of access 20.06.2025)
19. Gender and Women's Studies, BS. [Electronic resource]. URL: https://guide.wisc.edu/undergraduate/letters-science/gender-womens-studies/gender-womens-studies-bs/ (date of access 20.06.2025)
20. Lakoff R. Language and woman’s place. – New York: Harper & Row, 1975. [Electronic resource]. URL:
https://www.scribd.com/document/272131684/Lakoff-Robin-Language-and-Womans-Place (date of access 20.06.2025)
21. Harding S. The feminist standpoint theory reader: Intellectual and political controversies. – New York: Routledge, 2004. – 394 p.
22. Skelton C., Francis B. Feminism and ‘the schooling scandal’. – London: Routledge, 2009. – 192 p.
23. Zdravomyslova E.A., Temkina A.A. 12 lekci po gendernoi sociologii: uchebnoe posobie [12 lectures on gender sociology: a textbook]. – Sankt-Peterburg: Izdatelstvo Evropeiskogo universiteta v SanktPeterburge, 2015. – 768 s. [in Russian]
24. Kirilina A. O primenenii poniatia gender v russkoiazychnom lingvisticheskom opisanii [On the application of the concept of gender in the Russian linguistic description] // Filologicheskie nauki. – 2000. – №3. – S. 18-27.
25. Mun O., Kudaibergen D.T. Jeong and asar: Theorising reparative concepts in gendered artistic, activist, and academic spaces // European Journal of Women’s Studies. – 2025. – №32(2). – P. 159–176.
https://doi.org/10.1177/13505068251330986
26. Braidotti R. Metamorphoses: Towards a materialist theory of becoming. – Cambridge: Polity Press, 2002. – 328 p.
