Theoretical Orientations of the Essay Genre in Kazakh Literary Studies and Ecocriticism
Keywords:
essay writing, ecocriticism, authorial interpretation, communicative strategy, discourse.Abstract
This article provides a comprehensive examination of the essay genre in literary studies. The essay is defined as a hybrid genre formed at the intersection of journalism and fiction. Unlike other literary genres, the essay is distinguished by compositional freedom and a strong presence of authorial interpretation. The aim of the study is to analyze essays addressing the themes of nature, humanity, and ecology. To achieve this aim, the essay genre and its defining features are examined from a theoretical perspective, while authorial interpretation is analyzed in terms of literary, artistic, and aesthetic characteristics. The study reviews theoretical research on the formation and development of the essay as a genre in world literature, leading to the identification of its hybrid nature. In contemporary Kazakh literature, particularly at the pragmatic stage of its development, the essay genre has become one of the most dynamically evolving fields. Accordingly, this research examines essays that address issues of nature, humanity, and environmental concerns, with the authorial position analyzed within the framework of communicative strategies. The findings demonstrate that ecological essays in Kazakh literature are realized through authorial interpretation and indicate sustained attention to socially significant issues. The scholarly value of the study lies in identifying the relationship between the essay genre in Kazakh literary studies and pressing societal problems. As a cultural phenomenon, the essay genre explores environmental themes through the lens of ecocriticism and is understood as the result of authorial reflection.
References
1. Зинченко В.Г., Григорьевич З.В., Кирнозе З.И. Литература и методы ее изучения. Системно-синергетический подход: учебное пособие. – М.: Флинта, 2017. – 274 с.
2. Scholes R., Klaus C.H. Comley N.R. Elements of literature: Essay, Fiction, Poetry, Drama, Film. 4th edition. – Oxford University Press, 1991. – 1632 p.
3. Donald D. Varieties of the essay. Traditional and modern. – Belmont Calif, 1968.
4. Сұлтанғалиева Р.Б., Мусина Ж.Ғ., Емранова Ж.М. Қазіргі қазақ әдебиетіндегі эссе жанрының дамуы мен роман жанрына кірігу үдерісі (Қ. Ысқақтың «Келмес күндер елесі» роман-эссесі негізінде) // БҚМУ Хабаршысы. – 2017. – №2. – Б. 259-266.
5. Әдебиеттану терминдер сөздігі / Құраст.: З. Ахметов, Т. Шаңбаев. – Алматы: Ана тілі, 1996. – 234 б.
6. Шортанбай Ш.А. Қ. Ысқақтың «Келмес күндер елесі» роман-эссесіндегі қаламгерлер бейнесі және авторлық ұстаным // Ясауи университетінің хабаршысы. – 2023. – №1(127). – Б. 108-119. https://doi.org/10.47526/2023-1/2664-0686.09
7. Ісімақова А.С. Тәуелсіздік кезеңіндегі әдебиеттану: (Әдеби мақалалар): монография. – Алматы: «Каратау КБ» ЖШС: «Дәстүр», 2016. – 384 б.
8. Болотнова Н.С. Поэтический текст как форма репрезентации гиперконцепта // Язык и общество в синхронии и диахронии: Труды и материалы Международной конференции, посвящённой 80-летию со дня рождения проф. Л.И. Баранниковой. – Саратов: Научная книга, 2005. – С. 346-352.
9. Lemmer E. Ecocriticism // Journal of Literary Studies. – 2007. – Vol. 23, №4. – P. 223-227. https://doi.org/10.1080/02564710701568097
10. Руженцева Н.Б. Прагматическая и речевая организация русского литературно-критического эссе XX века: дис. ... док. филол. наук. – Екатеринбург, 2001. – 312 с.
11. Ысқақұлы Д. Сын жанрлары: оқу құралы. – Алматы: Санат, 1999. – 321 б.
12. Қабдолов З. Шығармалары. Т.5. Ғылыми зерттеулер. – Алматы: Қазақ энциклопедиясы, 2013. – 320 б.
13. Кекілбайұлы Ә. Шығармаларының жиырма томдық жинағы. 13-том. Мейір сөз. – Алматы: Жазушы, 2011. – 400 б.
14. Медетбек Т. Шығармалары. 7 томдық. 7-том. – Алматы: Керемет медиа, 2020. – 320 б.
15. Аралдың ақжал толқыны (Жазушы Қуаныш Жиенбайдың шығармашылық портреті туралы мақалалар жинағы) // Құраст.: Ш. Әбдікәрімов, Б. Омарұлы. – Алматы: «Қоғам» баспасы, 2022. – 288 б.
16. Кемелбаева А. Сөз хикмет: Эсселер, мақалалар, сұхбаттар. – Алматы: «Каратау КБ» ЖШС: «Дәстүр», 2016. – 384 б.
17. Эпштейн М.Н. Парадоксы новизны. О литературном развитии. – М.: Сов. писатель, 1988. – 417 с.
REFERENCES
1. Zinchenko V.G., Grigorievich Z.V., Kirnoze Z.I. Literatura i metody ee izuchenia. Sistemno-sinergeticheski podhod: uchebnoe posobie [Literature and methods of its study. The system-synergetic approach: a textbook]. – M.: Flinta, 2017. – 274 s. [in Russian]
2. Scholes R., Klaus C.H. Comley N.R. Elements of literature: Essay, Fiction, Poetry, Drama, Film. 4th edition. – Oxford University Press, 1991. – 1632 p.
3. Donald D. Varieties of the essay. Traditional and modern. – Belmont Calif, 1968.
4. Sultangalieva R.B., Musina Zh.G., Emranova Zh.M. Qazіrgі qazaq adebietіndegі esse zhanrynyn damuy men roman zhanryna kіrіgu uderіsі (Q. Ysqaqtyn «Kelmes kunder elesі» roman-essesі negіzіnde) [The process of development of the essay genre and integration into the novel genre in modern Kazakh literature (based on the novel-essay by K. Iskak “The illusion of Non-coming days”)] // BQMU Habarshysy. – 2017. – №2. – B. 259-266. [in Kazakh]
5. Adebiettanu terminder sozdіgі [Dictionary of literary studies terms] / Qurast.: Z. Ahmetov, T. Shanbaev. – Almaty: Ana tіlі, 1996. – 234 b. [in Kazakh]
6. Shortanbai Sh.A. Q. Ysqaqtyn «Kelmes kunder elesі» roman-essesіndegі qalamgerler beinesі zhane avtorlyq ustanym [The image of writers and the author's position in the novel-essay by K. Iskak “The illusion of Non-coming days”] // Iasaui universitetіnіn habarshysy. – 2023. – №1(127). – B. 108-119. https://doi.org/10.47526/2023-1/2664-0686.09 [in Kazakh]
7. Іsіmaqova A.S. Tauelsіzdіk kezenіndegі adebiettanu: (Adebi maqalalar): monografia [Literary Studies in the period of Independence: (Literary articles): monograph]. – Almaty: «Karatau KB» JShS: «Dastur», 2016. – 384 b. [in Kazakh]
8. Bolotnova N.S. Poeticheski tekst kak forma reprezentacii giperkoncepta [Poetic text as a form of hyperconcept representation] // Iazyk i obshestvo v sinhronii i diahronii: Trudy i materialy Mezhdunarodnoi konferencii, posviashionnoi 80-letiu so dnia rozhdenia prof. L.I. Barannikovoi. – Saratov: Nauchnaia kniga, 2005. – S. 346-352. [in Russian]
9. Lemmer E. Ecocriticism // Journal of Literary Studies. – 2007. – Vol. 23, №4. – P. 223-227. https://doi.org/10.1080/02564710701568097
10. Ruzhenceva N.B. Pragmaticheskaia i rechevaia organizacia russkogo literaturno-kriticheskogo esse XX veka: dis. ... dok. filol. nauk [The pragmatic and speech organization of the Russian literary and critical essay of the XX century: dis.]. – Ekaterinburg, 2001. – 312 s. [in Russian]
11. Ysqaquly D. Syn zhanrlary: oqu quraly [Genres of criticism: training manual]. – Almaty: Sanat, 1999. – 321 b. [in Kazakh]
12. Qabdolov Z. Shygarmalary. T.5. Gylymi zertteuler [Works. T. 5. Scientific Research]. – Almaty: Qazaq enciklopediasy, 2013. – 320 b. [in Kazakh]
13. Kekіlbaiuly A. Shygarmalarynyn zhiyrma tomdyq zhinagy. 13-tom. Meiіr soz [A twenty-volume collection of his works. Volume 13. The Merciful Word]. – Almaty: Zhazushy, 2011. – 400 b. [in Kazakh]
14. Medetbek T. Shygarmalary. 7 tomdyq. 7-tom [Works. In 7 volumes. Volume 7]. – Almaty: Keremet media, 2020. – 320 b. [in Kazakh]
15. Araldyn aqzhal tolqyny (Zhazushy Quanysh Zhienbaidyn shygarmashylyq portretі turaly maqalalar zhinagy) [The white-haired wave of the island (a collection of articles about the creative portrait of the writer Kuanysh Zhienbai)] // Qurast.: Sh. Abdіkarіmov, B. Omaruly. – Almaty: «Qogam» baspasy, 2022. – 288 b. [in Kazakh]
16. Kemelbaeva A. Soz hikmet: esseler, maqalalar, suhbattar [Word wisdom: essays, articles, interviews]. – Almaty: «Karatau KB» ZhShS: «Dastur», 2016. – 384 b. [in Kazakh]
17. Epshtein M.N. Paradoksy novizny. O literaturnom razvitii [Paradoxes of novelty. About literary development]. – M.: Sov. pisatel, 1988. – 417 s. [in Russian]
