The THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS AND CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF LECTURE-BASED TEACHING METHODS IN THE CONTEXT OF CYBERCOMMUNICATIVE ADDICTION PREVENTION

Authors

  • S.A. SADYKOVA K. Zhubanov Aktobe Regional University
  • B.T. KERIMBAYEVA K. Zhubanov Aktobe Regional University
  • Y.R. KERIMBEKOV South Kazakhstan Pedagogical University named after O.Zhanibekov

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47526/3107-3123.102

Keywords:

cybercommunicative addiction, prevention, teaching methods, lecture formats, digital hygiene, self-regulation, integrated pedagogical model.

Abstract

The article presents the results of a methodological study focused on systematizing lecture-based and practical teaching methods for the prevention of cyber-communication addiction among students of higher education institutions. Our research methodology is based on a systematic analysis and overview of classic educational theories (such as constructivism, social learning theory,
and self-determination theory), a critical review of recent research on digital addiction (2010–2025), as well as the design of an integrated theoretical model. A justification is provided for the effectiveness of traditional lectures in behavioral change; suitable lecture formats (problem-based, visualized, dialogic, and expert-led) identified and structured; required practical methods (case studies, role-playing, self-regulation training, and project-based tasks) are identified; an integrated pedagogical model for the prevention of cyber-communication dependence (IPM-CCDP), including cognitive, behavioral, reflective, and project-based components, is designed based on this review. In the context of the digital transformation of education, the problem of cyber-communication addiction
requires a comprehensive pedagogical approach that combines traditional teaching formats with interactive, practice-oriented methods. This study shows effective cybercommunication addiction prevention requires transformation of the student's role from a passive recipient of information to an active participant responsible for their own digital well-being. The novelty of the study is the systematic integration of pedagogical methods and their theoretical foundations by combining classical pedagogical theories with Griffiths’s additive model of addiction.

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

1. Young K.S. Internet addiction: the emergence of a new clinical disorder // CyberPsychology & Behavior. – 1998. – Vol. 1, №3. – P. 237-244. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.1998.1.237.

2. Griffiths M.D. A 'components' model of addiction within a biopsychosocial framework // Journal of Substance Use. – 2005. – Vol. 10, №4. – P. 191-197. https://doi.org/10.1080/14659890500114359.

3. Kariyev A., Orazbayeva F., Zhunusbekova A., Kenzhetaeva R. Types of Internet addiction among Kazakhstan students in the digital educational space // Insight: The Psychological Dimensions of Society. – 2025. – Vol. 13. – P. 240-259. https://doi.org/10.32999/2663-970X/2025-13-10.

4. Biggs J. Teaching for quality learning at university. – 2nd ed. – Buckingham: Open University Press, 2003. – 309 p.

5. Ramsden P. Learning to teach in higher education. – 2nd ed. – London: Routledge, 2003. – 288 p. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203507711.

6. Piaget J. Science of education and the psychology of the child. – New York: Orion Press, 1970. – 186 p.

7. Vygotsky L.S. Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes / ed. by M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, E. Souberman. – Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1978. – 159 p. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjf9vz4.

8. Bandura A. Social learning theory. – Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1977. – 247 p.

9. Deci E.L., Ryan R.M. The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: human needs and the self-determination of behavior // Psychological Inquiry. – 2000. – Vol. 11, №4. – P. 227-268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01.

10. Kuss D.J., Griffiths M.D. Internet gaming addiction: a systematic review of empirical research // International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction. – 2012. – Vol. 10. – P. 278-296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-011-9318-5.

11. Livingstone S., Helsper E.J. Balancing opportunities and risks in teenagers' use of the internet: the role of online skills and internet self-efficacy // New Media & Society. – 2010. – Vol. 12, №2. – P. 309-329. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444809342697.

12. Buckingham D. Digital media literacies: rethinking media education in the age of the Internet // Research in Comparative and International Education. – 2007. – Vol. 2, №1. – P. 43-55. https://doi.org/10.2304/rcie.2007.2.1.43.

13. Kerimbayeva B.T., Kerimbekov Y.R., Sapargaliyeva D.D. The Importance of Developing a Network Communicative Culture of the Future Teacher // Iasaui universitetinin habarshysy. – 2022. – №4 (126). – P. 281–293. https://doi.org/10.47526/2022-4/2664-0686.24

14. Kerimbayeva B.T., Kerimbekov Y.R., Satbai Zh.I. Network Communication Culture Impact on the Lifelong Learning of Future Teachers // Iasaui universitetinin habarshysy. – 2024. – №3 (133). – B. 191–205. https://doi.org/10.47526/2024-3/2664-0686.86

15. Tao R., Huang X., Wang J., Zhang H., Zhang Y., Li M. Proposed diagnostic criteria for internet addiction // Addiction. – 2010. – Vol. 105, №3. – P. 556-564. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02828.x.

16. Dewey J. Experience and education // The Educational Forum. – 1986. – Vol. 50, №3. – P. 241-252.

17. Barrows H.S. A taxonomy of problem-based learning methods // Medical Education. – 1986. – Vol. 20, №6. – P. 481-486. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.1986.tb01386.x.

18. Strobel J., van Barneveld A. When is PBL more effective? A meta-synthesis of meta-analyses comparing PBL to conventional classrooms // Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning. – 2009. – Vol. 3, №1. – P. 44-58. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1046.

19. Paivio A. Mental representations: a dual coding approach. – New York: Oxford University Press, 1986. – 336 p. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195066661.001.0001.

20. Mayer R.E. The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. – 2nd ed. – New York: Cambridge University Press, 2014. – 930 p. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139547369.

21. Prince M. Does active learning work? A review of the research // Journal of Engineering Education. – 2004. – Vol. 93, №3. – P. 223-231. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x.

22. Knowles M.S. The adult learner: a neglected species. – 3rd ed. – Houston: Gulf Publishing, 1984. – 292 p.

23. Thistlethwaite J.E., Davies D., Ekeocha S., Kidd J.M., MacDougall C., Matthews P., Purkis J., Clay D. The effectiveness of case-based learning in health professional education // Medical Teacher. – 2012. – Vol. 34, №6. – P. 421-444. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2012.680939.

24. Zimmerman B.J. Becoming a self-regulated learner: an overview // Theory Into Practice. – 2002. – Vol. 41, №2. – P. 64-70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2.

25. Thomas J.W. A review of research on project-based learning. – San Rafael: Autodesk Foundation, 2000. – 47 p.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-02

How to Cite

SADYKOVA, S., KERIMBAYEVA, B., & KERIMBEKOV, Y. (2026). The THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS AND CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF LECTURE-BASED TEACHING METHODS IN THE CONTEXT OF CYBERCOMMUNICATIVE ADDICTION PREVENTION. Yassawi Journal of Education Studies, 2(140), 122–135. https://doi.org/10.47526/3107-3123.102

Issue

Section

Articles