FORMATION OF A CREATIVE ATTITUDE TO RESEARCH AS A PERSONAL NEED
Keywords:
creativity, thinking, model, graphics, design, technology, educational process.Abstract
This article explores the organization of the educational process for the formation of general technological knowledge, which requires the teacher of a higher educational institution to solve many issues related to the definition of content, organizational forms, methods and means of education. However, the problem of selecting educational content is the most important, because it is the content that determines the structure of individual classes and the educational process as a whole. The main goal is to develop students' knowledge, skills, and personal qualities, allowing them to navigate the ongoing changes in the field of graphics and design, and to activate their activities. On the other hand, any branch of scientific knowledge is an ever-increasing set of factors, concepts, patterns, hypotheses, etc., which, at a sufficiently high level of science, are united by theory. In order to effectively solve this problem, students should read a special section on graphics and design to optimize the creative process by mathematical modeling. The methodological basis of the study includes methods of statistical control, analysis, and synthesis. Mathematical modeling was performed using methods for solving metric and positional graphical problems based on data analysis.
Special attention is paid to the process and result of mastering systematized tasks in psychological, pedagogical, art history, economic disciplines in order to develop and form the creative abilities of students in the field of graphics, design and technology in modern conditions. The task is to form students' knowledge, skills and personality traits that allow them to navigate the ongoing changes in the field of graphics and design, and to intensify their activities.
References
ПАЙДАЛАНЫЛҒАН ӘДЕБИЕТТЕР ТІЗІМІ
1. Занфирова Л.В., Судник Ю.А. Генезис и содержание понятия «Техническое мышление» // Вестник ФГОУ ВПО МГАУ. – 2013. – №4. – С. 13-17.
2. Lyons R.T., Lynn C.M. Bhaird Individual level assessment in entrepreneurship education: An investigation of theories and techniques // Journal of Entrepreneurship Education. – 2015. – №18 (1). – P. 136-156.
3. Kingma B. Creating a dynamic campus-community entrepreneurial ecosystem: Key characteristics of success // In: Academic entrepreneurship: Creating an entrepreneurial ecosystem. – Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Ltd, 2014. – P. 97-114. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1074-754020140000016003
4. Nurke M.S., Karatajiene D.R. Transformation of visual art in noospheric learning based on unique perception // Абай атындағы ҚазҰПУ хабаршысы. – 2022. – №1(50). – Б. 114-121.
5. Абишева О.Т. Болашақ дизайн саласындағы кәсіптік оқыту педагогын кәсіби іс-әрекетке даярлауда көркемдік жобалау құзіреттілігінің рөлі //Ясауи университетінің хабаршысы. – 2022. – №3(125). – Б. 276-288. https://doi.org/10.47526/2022-3/2664-0686.24
6. Болысбаев Д.С., Маханбетова Н.Ә., Сулейменова Ж.О., Мамешов М.Ж. Шығармашылық ойлау әдісі және ою-өрнектегі көркемдік ойлау жүйесі // Ясауи университетінің хабаршысы. – 2021. – №2(120). – Б. 188-199.
7. Рахымбек Д., Беркімбаев К.М., Қадірбаева Р.І., Алимкулова Б.Т. Оқытудан күтілетін нәтижені есепке алуды жетілдіру // Ясауи университетінің хабаршысы. – 2020. – №2 (116). – Б. 223–235.
8. Karaşeva Z., Amirova A., Ageeva L., Cazdykbayeva M., Widullakızy E. İlkokul çağındaki çocuklarda öğrenme iletişimi becerilerini oluşturmak için gelecekteki profesyonellerin hazırlanması // Dünya Eğitim Teknolojileri Dergisi. – 2021. – №13 (3). – S. 467–484.
9. Блинов В.И., Дулинов М.В., Есенина Е.Ю., Сергеев И.С. Проект дидактической концепции цифрового профессионального образования и обучения. – М.: Перо, 2019. – 72 с.
10. Калимбетов Б.Т., Омарова И.М., Сапаков Д.А. Білім беруді цифрландыру жағдайында математика бакалаврларына функцияларды графикалық кескін түрінде көрсетуді үйрету // Ясауи университетінің хабаршысы. – 2023. – №1(127). – Б. 215-224. https://doi.org/10.47526/2023-1/26640686.18
11. Сихынбаева Ж.С., Жолдасбекова Д.А. Болашақ арнайы педагогтардың кәсіби іс-әрекетін жетілдіруге дайындығын арттыру // Ясауи университетінің хабаршысы. – 2023. –№3(129). – Б. 224–238. https://doi.org/10.47526/2023-3/2664-0686.17
12. Оразаева Г.С. Болашақ арнайы педагогтардың кәсіпқойлық негіздерін қалыптастырудың заманауи үрдістері // Қазақ мемлекеттік қыздар педагогикалық университетінің хабаршысы. – 2019. – №2(78). – Б. 240-245.
13. Дубовицкая Т.Д. Методика диагностики направленности учебной мотивации // Психологическая наука и образование. – 2002. – T.7, №2. – С. 42–45.
14. Thomson S.B. Sample Size and Grounded Theory // Journal of Administration and Governance (JOAAG). – 2010. – №5(1).- P. 45-52.
15. Sandelowski M. Sample size in qualitative research // Research in Nursing & Health. – 1995. – №18(2). –
P. 179–183.
16. Агальцов В.П. Контроль знаний – доминирующая составляющая образовательного процесса // Информатика и образование. – 2005. – №2. – С. 94–96.
17. Hotulainen R., Vinni-Laakso J., Kupiainen S. Development of Learning to Learn Competence across Secondary Education and its Association with Attainment in Finnish/Swedish High-Stake Exit Exam // Thinking Skills and Creativity. – 2020. – Vol. 38. – P. 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100738
18. Андреева О.С., Селиванова О.А., Васильева И.В. Комплексная диагностика компонентов исследовательской компетенции у студентов педагогических направлений подготовки // Образование и наука. – 2019. – Том 21, №1. https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2019-1-37-58
REFERENCES
1. Zanfirova L.V., Sudnik Iu.A. Genezis i soderzhanie poniatia «Tehnicheskoe myshlenie» [The genesis and content of the concept of “Technical thinking”] // Vestnik FGOU VPO MGAU. – 2013. – №4. – S. 1317. [in Russian]
2. Lyons R.T., Lynn C.M. Bhaird Individual level assessment in entrepreneurship education: An investigation of theories and techniques // Journal of Entrepreneurship Education. – 2015. – №18 (1). – P. 136-156.
3. Kingma B. Creating a dynamic campus-community entrepreneurial ecosystem: Key characteristics of success // In: Academic entrepreneurship: Creating an entrepreneurial ecosystem. – Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Ltd, 2014. – P. 97-114. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1074-754020140000016003
4. Nurke M.S., Karatajiene D.R. Transformation of visual art in noospheric learning based on unique perception // Abai atyndagy QazUPU habarshysy. – 2022. – №1(50). – P. 114-121.
5. Abisheva O.T. Bolashaq dizain salasyndagy kasіptіk oqytu pedagogyn kasіbi іs-areketke daiarlauda korkemdіk zhobalau quzіrettіlіgіnіn rolі [The role of artistic design competence in the preparation of a teacher of vocational training in the field of future design for professional activities] // Iasaui universitetіnіn habarshysy. – 2022. – №3(125). – B. 276-288. https://doi.org/10.47526/2022-3/26640686.24 [in Kazakh]
6. Bolysbaev D.S., Mahanbetova N.A., Suleimenova Zh.O., Mameshov M.Zh. Shygarmashylyq oilau adіsі zhane oiu-ornektegі korkemdіk oilau zhuiesі [The method of creative thinking and the system of artistic thinking in ornament] // Iasaui universitetіnіn habarshysy. – 2021. – №2(120). – B. 188-199. [in Kazakh]
7. Rahymbek D., Berkіmbaev K.M., Қadіrbaeva R.І., Alimkulova B.T. Oqytudan kutіletіn natizhenі esepke aludy zhetіldіru [Improving the accounting of the expected result of training] // Iasaui universitetіnіn habarshysy. – 2020. – №2 (116). – B. 223–235. [in Kazakh]
8. Karaşeva Z., Amirova A., Ageeva L., Cazdykbayeva M., Widullakızy E. İlkokul çağındaki çocuklarda öğrenme iletişimi becerilerini oluşturmak için gelecekteki profesyonellerin hazırlanması [Preparing future professionals to develop learning and communication skills in primary school-aged children] // Dünya Eğitim Teknolojileri Dergisi. – 2021. – №13 (3). – S. 467–484. [in Turkish]
9. Blinov V.I., Dulinov M.V., Esenina E.Iu., Sergeev I.S. Proekt didakticheskoi koncepcii cifrovogo professionalnogo obrazovania i obuchenia [The project of the didactic concept of digital vocational education and training]. – M.: Pero, 2019. – 72 s. [in Russian]
10. Kalimbetov B.T., Omarova I.M., Sapakov D.A. Bіlіm berudі cifrlandyru zhagdaiynda matematika bakalavrlaryna funkcialardy grafikalyq keskіn turіnde korsetudі uiretu [Teaching Bachelors of mathematics in the context of digitalization of education to display functions in the form of graphic images] // Iasaui universitetіnіn habarshysy. – 2023. – №1(127). – B. 215-224. https://doi.org/10.47526/2023-1/2664-0686.18 [in Kazakh]
11. Sihynbaeva J.S., Joldasbekova D.A. Bolashaq arnaiy pedagogtardyn kasіbi іs-areketіn jetіldіruge daiyndygyn arttyru [Development of Readiness of Future Special Teachers to Improve Professional
Activities] // Iasaui universitetіnіn habarshysy. – 2023. – №3 (129). – B. 224–238. https://doi.org/10.47526/2023-3/2664- 0686.17 [in Kazakh]
12. Orazaeva G.S. Bolashaq arnaiy pedagogtardyn kasіpqoilyq negіzderіn qalyptastyrudyn zamanaui urdіsterі [Modern trends in the formation of the foundations of professionalism of future special teachers] // Qazaq memlekettіk qyzdar pedagogikalyq universitetіnіn habarshysy. – 2019. – №2(78). – B. 240-245. [in Kazakh]
13. Dubovickaia T.D. Metodika diagnostiki napravlennosti uchebnoi motivacii [The methodology for diagnosing the orientation of educational motivation] // Psihologicheskaia nauka i obrazovanie. – 2002. – T.7, №2. – S. 42–45. [in Russian]
14. Thomson S.B. Sample Size and Grounded Theory // Journal of Administration and Governance (JOAAG). – 2010. – №5(1).- P. 45-52.
15. Sandelowski M. Sample size in qualitative research // Research in Nursing & Health. – 1995. – №18(2). –
P. 179–183.
16. Agalcov V.P. Kontrol znani – dominiruiushaia sostavliaiushaia obrazovatelnogo processa [Knowledge control is the dominant component of the educational process] // Informatika i obrazovanie. – 2005. – №2. – S. 94–96. [in Russian]
17. Hotulainen R., Vinni-Laakso J., Kupiainen S. Development of Learning to Learn Competence across Secondary Education and its Association with Attainment in Finnish/Swedish High-Stake Exit Exam // Thinking Skills and Creativity. – 2020. – Vol. 38. – P. 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100738
18. Andreeva O.S., Selivanova O.A., Vasilieva I.V. Kompleksnaia diagnostika komponentov issledovatelskoi kompetencii u studentov pedagogicheskih napravleni podgotovki [Comprehensive diagnostics of the components of research competence among students of pedagogical fields of study] // Obrazovanie i nauka. – 2019. – Tom 21, №1. https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2019-1-37-58 [in Russian]
